Name: | Description: | Size: | Format: | |
---|---|---|---|---|
426.15 KB | Adobe PDF |
Advisor(s)
Abstract(s)
Introduction: This study compared the psychometric properties of two primary
instruments for assessing sport motivation based on Self-Determination Theory:
the Sport Motivation Scale-II (SMS-II) and the Behavioral Regulation in Sport
Questionnaire (BRSQ).
Methods: A cross-sectional analysis evaluated the scales’ internal consistency,
factor structure, convergent and discriminant validity, and model fit, which
required post-hoc modifications. Measurement invariance and adherence to
the theoretical simplex pattern were also tested.
Results: The BRSQ demonstrated generally acceptable reliability, while the SMS-II
showed deficiencies in its introjected, external, and amotivation subscales. Both
scales faced validity challenges in distinguishing adjacent motivational constructs.
Although measurement invariance was supported, correlations deviated from the
theoretical quasi-simplex pattern.
Discussion: The BRSQ appears more robust, but neither scale is flawless. Researchers
must select instruments aligned with their specific objectives and interpret scores
cautiously due to these psychometric limitations. This underscores the need for
refined tools to better capture the dynamic complexity of motivation in sports.
Description
Keywords
motivation self-determination theory sport motivation scale-II behavioral regulation in sport questionnaire self-determinant theory
Pedagogical Context
Citation
Bica J, Jacinto M, Matos R, Amaro N, Antunes R, Couto N, Cid L, Forte P and Monteiro D (2025) Behavioral regulation in sport questionnaire and sport motivation scale-II: a scale comparison. Front. Psychol. 16:1652580. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2025.1652580
Publisher
Frontiers