Name: | Description: | Size: | Format: | |
---|---|---|---|---|
822.04 KB | Adobe PDF |
Advisor(s)
Abstract(s)
In this paper, we draw on a conceptual framework of five key categories of
risk to Early Leaving (EL) to analyse and compare ‘Structural Factors’ (SF)
and ‘Institutional Factors’ (IF) of risk in a region in England and in Portugal.
We draw on data from an EU-funded project, which explored risks and
support strategies to EL across five European countries. Our two-country
comparison involved analysis of 59 semi-structured interviews and focus
groups with 209 educational stakeholders across 18 educational settings.
We discuss key similarities and differences across the data, reflecting on
plausible factors these are attributed to. SF was the most discussed risk
category in England but not in Portugal, albeit largely for the same reason:
that they are difficult to address, relating to rigid and entrenched educational systems and policies, socio-economic disadvantage and inequalities. Educators were cognisant of how SF hinders educational institutions
and stakeholders from addressing EL, given the lack of freedom and
flexibility they engender. Young people focused more on how the IF of
schooling are impacting EL. We explore the implications of our findings for
EL risk and offer recommendations that will be of interest to a range of
educational stakeholders, including policymakers, educators and
employers.
Description
604501-EPP-1-2018-1-ES-EPPKA3-IPI-SOC-IN
Keywords
Comparative and international education Education polic Early leaving Early school leaving NEET