Name: | Description: | Size: | Format: | |
---|---|---|---|---|
244.22 KB | Adobe PDF |
Authors
Advisor(s)
Abstract(s)
Public art, despite is extension to the urban landscapes, has been a limited artistic practice in terms of critical discussion. In this sense, is has been used as an urban form for remodelling or, instead, as an ordinary form of expansion of the artists audience.
However, public art can be understood as a social awareness practice creating the need to set up a broader critical discourse contributing to a greater democratization to the artistic practice. In this sense, there has been a growing number of visual artists who believe that art and the role of public entities isn’t just the creation of permanent art objects, but rather a way to facilitate the creation of artworks that encourage actions, ideas and the intervention of the audience, making the public artwork an object that calls to social responsibility.
Bio art has tried to demonstrate, through its aesthetic discourse, the need to establish a broader public discussion. Thus, in this paper we will highlight the importance of an odd art public project of Natalie Jeremijenko – One Tree(s) (2000). Through the questions raised by this artwork, we will reflect on how the intersection between art and technoscience can contribute to a greater extension of the idea of hard humanities and on how a larger critical reflection can be exercise through and beyond the art world toward a field that involves in the same discourse art, science, society and the urban network.
Description
Artigo apresentado no Congresso Internacional ACC – Arte, Ciencia y Ciudad na Universidade do País Basco.
Keywords
Bio art Public art Social art engagement Hard humanities Social responsibility
Citation
In: AUSART Journal for Research in Art. 1 (2013), 1, pp. 115-121.