Repository logo
 
Publication

Load and psychophysiological responses in high-intensity interval training with fixed and self-selected recovery

2026-01-05Research article Open access
Simple item page
datacite.subject.sdg03:Saúde de Qualidade
datacite.subject.sdg04:Educação de Qualidade
datacite.subject.sdg09:Indústria, Inovação e Infraestruturas
dc.contributor.authorSant’Ana, Leandro
dc.contributor.authorMacedo Vianna, Jeferson
dc.contributor.authorRodrigues Scartoni, Fabiana
dc.contributor.authorTolomeu de Oliveira, Géssyca
dc.contributor.authorMacedo Carvalho, Bruna
dc.contributor.authorDe Sena Altomar, Marconi
dc.contributor.authorTeixeira, Diogo
dc.contributor.authorAntunes, R.
dc.contributor.authorRodrigues, Filipe
dc.contributor.authorMatos, Rui
dc.contributor.authorNovaes, Jefferson da Silva
dc.contributor.authorMachado, Sérgio
dc.contributor.authorMonteiro, Diogo
dc.date.accessioned2025-12-17T18:47:44Z
dc.date.available2025-12-17T18:47:44Z
dc.date.issued2026-01-05en_US
dc.date.updated2025-12-17T09:01:24Z
dc.description.abstractIntroduction and Objective. The study analyzed the training load in high-intensity interval training sessions with different conditions of recovery time between stimuli: fixed (1min.) and self-selected. Methods. Nineteen individuals participated in the study: 13 men and 6 women (19±1.0 years; 64.0±9.2 kg; 169±8.5 cm; 22.0±2 BMI). For the training load analysis, heart rate variability (LnRMSSD), perceived effort (PE), and mood scale BRUMS (MS) were used. LnRMSSD and MS were evaluated before and after the sessions. The PE was evaluated during each session immediately after each stimulus. The protocol was 10 x 30s (95% Vpeak) with active recovery (40% Vpeak) in fixed or self-selected time. ANOVA-RM (2 [interventions] x 2 [time points]) for LnRMSSD and MS and (2 [interventions] x 10 [time points]) for PE was used. Results. Between condition and time*condition, no differences were observed for LnRMSSD (p=.626; p=.879, respectively), PE (p=.191; p=.792, respectively), and MS (tension: p=.673; p=.463; depression: p=.867; p=.359; anger: p=.867; p=.359; vigor: p=.811; p=.778; fatigue: p=.144; p=.998; mental confusion: p=.828; p=.752, respectively). In terms of time, significant differences were observed in LnRMSSD (p<.001) and PE (1≠3-10; 2≠4-10; 3≠5-10; 4≠5-10; 5≠7-10; 6≠7-10; 7≠ 9,10; 8≠10, p<.001). In MS, there was a difference in domains of tension (p<.001), depression (p<.015), anger (p<.033), and mental confusion (p<.001). But not for vigor (p=.339) nor fatigue (p=.419), which are associated with the training load. Conclusions. However, both recovery conditions showed similar acute internal load responses. Additionally, it is suggested that recovery with self-selected time (46.70±1.6.58s) may be a recovery option in HIIT prescription.eng
dc.description.abstractIntroducción y Objetivo. El estudio analizó la carga de entrenamiento en sesiones de entrenamiento interválico de alta intensidad con diferentes condiciones de tiempo de recuperación entre estímulos fijos (1min.) y autoseleccionados. Métodos. Diecinueve individuos participaron en el estudio: 13 hombres y 6 mujeres (19±1,0 años; 64,0±9,2 kg; 169±8,5 cm; 22,0±2 IMC). Para el análisis de la carga de entrenamiento se utilizaron la variabilidad de la frecuencia cardiaca (LnRMSSD), el esfuerzo percibido (PE) y la escala de estados de ánimo (MS). LnRMSSD y MS se evaluaron antes y después de las sesiones. La PE se evaluó durante cada sesión inmediatamente después de cada estímulo. El protocolo fue de 10 x 30s (95% Vpico) con recuperación activa (40% Vpico) en tiempo fijo o auto seleccionado. Se utilizó ANOVA-RM (2 [intervenciones] x 2 [puntos temporales]) para LnRMSSD y MS y (2 [intervenciones] x 10 [puntos temporales]) para PE. Resultados. Entre condición y tiempo*condición, no se observaron diferencias para LnRMSSD (p=.626; p=.879, respectivamente), PE (p=.191; p=.792, respectivamente), y MS (tensión: p=.673; p=.463; depresión: p=.867; p=.359; ira: p=.867; p=.359; vigor: p=.811; p=.778; fatiga: p=.144; p=.998; confusión mental: p=.828; p=.752, respectivamente). En cuanto al tiempo, se observaron diferencias significativas en LnRMSSD (p<.001) y PE (1≠3-10; 2≠4-10; 3≠5-10; 4≠5- 10; 5≠7-10; 6≠7-10; 7≠ 9,10; 8≠10, p<.001). En la MS, hubo diferencias en los dominios de tensión (p<.001), depresión (p<.015), ira (p<.033) y confusión mental (p<.001). Pero no para vigor (p=.339) ni fatiga (p=.419), que están asociados con la carga de entrenamiento. Conclusiones. Sin embargo, ambas condiciones de recuperación mostraron respuestas de carga interna aguda similares. Además, se sugiere que la recuperación con tiempo autoseleccionado (46,70±1,6,58s) puede ser una opción de recuperación en la prescripción de HIIT.spa
dc.description.sponsorshipPost Graduate Program in Physical Education, Federal University of Juiz de Fora (UFJF). Higher School of Education and Social Sciences (ESECS), Polytechnic of Leiria, Leiria, Portugal.
dc.description.versioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.identifier.citationSant’Ana, L.D., Macedo Vianna, J., Rodrigues Scartoni, F., Tolomeu de Oliveira, G., Macedo Carvalho, B., De Sena Altomar, M., Teixeira, D.S., Antunes, R., Rodrigues, F., Matos, R., da Silva Novaes, J., Machado, S., & Monteiro, D.M. (2025). Load and psychophysiological responses in high-intensity interval training with fixed and self-selected recovery. Retos.
dc.identifier.doi10.47197/retos.v74.110831en_US
dc.identifier.issn1988-2041en_US
dc.identifier.issn1579-1726en_US
dc.identifier.slugcv-prod-4624765
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10400.8/15140
dc.language.isoeng
dc.peerreviewedyes
dc.relation.hasversionhttps://revistaretos.org/index.php/retos/
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
dc.subjectHigh-intensity interval trainingen_US
dc.subjecttraining loaden_US
dc.subjectheart rate variabilityen_US
dc.subjectperceived efforten_US
dc.subjectmooden_US
dc.subjectphysiological adaptatioen_US
dc.subjectEntrenamiento interválico de alta intensidad
dc.subjectcarga de entrenamiento
dc.subjectvariabilidad de la frecuencia cardiaca
dc.subjectesfuerzo percibido
dc.subjectestado de ánimo
dc.subjectadaptaciones fisiológicas.
dc.titleLoad and psychophysiological responses in high-intensity interval training with fixed and self-selected recoveryeng
dc.title.alternativeRespuestas de carga y psicofisiológicas en el entrenamiento por intervalos de alta intensidad con recuperación fija y autoseleccionadaspa
dc.typeresearch articleen_US
dspace.entity.typePublication
oaire.citation.endPage729
oaire.citation.startPage718
oaire.citation.titleRetosen_US
oaire.citation.volume74en_US
oaire.versionhttp://purl.org/coar/version/c_ab4af688f83e57aa
person.familyNameRodrigues
person.familyNameMatos
person.familyNameMonteiro
person.givenNameFilipe
person.givenNameRui
person.givenNameDiogo
person.identifier613329
person.identifierF-1202-2015
person.identifier.ciencia-id9B18-7FE1-74AF
person.identifier.ciencia-idE91C-D6C7-62A5
person.identifier.ciencia-idED1F-6228-E26F
person.identifier.orcid0000-0003-1327-8872
person.identifier.orcid0000-0002-2034-0585
person.identifier.orcid0000-0002-7179-6814
person.identifier.ridA-8152-2019
person.identifier.scopus-author-id57206270107
person.identifier.scopus-author-id55315503400
person.identifier.scopus-author-id56437945500
rcaap.cv.cienciaidED1F-6228-E26F | Diogo Manuel Teixeira Monteiro
rcaap.rightsopenAccessen_US
relation.isAuthorOfPublication661e2126-79f7-445a-bda0-eb4c9d0bb0e2
relation.isAuthorOfPublication28ca4c61-3386-4b73-9eef-c377816d5a31
relation.isAuthorOfPublication79dcae83-d54a-4acc-a9a1-8268c7776ab9
relation.isAuthorOfPublication.latestForDiscovery661e2126-79f7-445a-bda0-eb4c9d0bb0e2

Files

Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Thumbnail Image
Name:
SantA_Ana_et_al._2026__Retos.pdf
Size:
670.67 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Download
License bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
No Thumbnail Available
Name:
license.txt
Size:
1.33 KB
Format:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Description:
Download

Collections

CIDESD-IPLeiria – Artigos
ESECS - Artigos em revistas internacionais