Publication
Validation Testing of the European Portuguese Critical-Care Pain Observation Tool
dc.contributor.author | Marques, Rita | |
dc.contributor.author | Araújo, Filipa | |
dc.contributor.author | Fernandes, Marisa | |
dc.contributor.author | Freitas, José | |
dc.contributor.author | Dixe, Maria dos Anjos | |
dc.contributor.author | Gélinas, Céline | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2023-05-23T10:00:20Z | |
dc.date.available | 2023-05-23T10:00:20Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2022-06-09 | |
dc.description.abstract | Aim. The study aim was to validate the Portuguese version of the Critical-Care Pain Observation Tool (CPOT) in the critically ill adult population of Portugal. Methods. A prospective, observational cohort study was conducted to evaluate the CPOT in mechanically ventilated patients who were admitted to an intensive care unit. A consecutive sample of 110 patients was observed at rest pre-procedure, during a nociceptive procedure (NP) which includes turning/positioning and endotracheal or tracheal suctioning and 20 min post-procedure. Two raters participated in the data collection. The discriminative validity, criterion validity, convergent validity and inter-rater reliability of the CPOT were examined. Results. The inter-rater reliability was excellent (0.93 ≤ α ≤ 1.00) at rest and fair to moderate (0.39 ≤ α ≤ 0.60) during the NP. The CPOT could discriminate between conditions with higher scores during the NP when compared to CPOT scores at rest (p < 0.001). The optimal CPOT cut-off score was >2, with a sensitivity of 71% and a specificity of 80%, and selfreported pain was the gold standard criterion. Significant correlations (<0.40) were found between CPOT scores, the heart rate and the respiratory rate during the nociceptive procedure. Conclusions. The CPOT appears to be a valid alternative for both ventilated and non-ventilated patients who are unable to communicate. | pt_PT |
dc.description.version | info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion | pt_PT |
dc.identifier.citation | Marques R, Araújo F, Fernandes M, Freitas J, Dixe MA, Gélinas C. Validation Testing of the European Portuguese Critical-Care Pain Observation Tool. Healthcare (Basel). 2022 Jun 9;10(6):1075. doi: 10.3390/healthcare10061075. PMID: 35742126; PMCID: PMC9222682. | pt_PT |
dc.identifier.doi | https://doi.org/10.3390/healthcare10061075 | pt_PT |
dc.identifier.eissn | 2227-9032 | |
dc.identifier.pmc | 9222682 | |
dc.identifier.pmid | 35742126 | |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/10400.8/8492 | |
dc.language.iso | eng | pt_PT |
dc.peerreviewed | yes | pt_PT |
dc.publisher | MDPI | pt_PT |
dc.relation.publisherversion | https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/35742126/ | pt_PT |
dc.rights.uri | http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ | pt_PT |
dc.subject | Pain assessment | pt_PT |
dc.subject | Critical care nursing | pt_PT |
dc.subject | Validation | pt_PT |
dc.title | Validation Testing of the European Portuguese Critical-Care Pain Observation Tool | pt_PT |
dc.type | journal article | |
dspace.entity.type | Publication | |
oaire.citation.issue | 6 | pt_PT |
oaire.citation.startPage | 1075 | pt_PT |
oaire.citation.title | Healthcare | pt_PT |
oaire.citation.volume | 10 | pt_PT |
person.familyName | Dixe | |
person.givenName | Maria dos Anjos | |
person.identifier | 794059 | |
person.identifier.ciencia-id | DB15-BD76-2B75 | |
person.identifier.orcid | 0000-0001-9035-8548 | |
person.identifier.rid | B-9257-2018 | |
person.identifier.scopus-author-id | 55885797900 | |
rcaap.rights | openAccess | pt_PT |
rcaap.type | article | pt_PT |
relation.isAuthorOfPublication | 591800d1-2c83-4227-af0a-b330a0acebac | |
relation.isAuthorOfPublication.latestForDiscovery | 591800d1-2c83-4227-af0a-b330a0acebac |