Browsing by Author "Silva, Fernanda M."
Now showing 1 - 3 of 3
Results Per Page
Sort Options
- Assessing Functional Ankle Instability in Sport: A Critical Review and Bibliometric AnalysisPublication . Alexandre, Élio; Monteiro, Diogo; SottoMayor, Ricardo; Jacinto, Miguel; Silva, Fernanda M.; Cid, Luis; Duarte-Mendes, Pedrofirst_pageDownload PDFsettingsOrder Article Reprints Open AccessReview Assessing Functional Ankle Instability in Sport: A Critical Review and Bibliometric Analysis by Élio Alexandre 1,Diogo Monteiro 1,2ORCID,Ricardo SottoMayor 1ORCID,Miguel Jacinto 1,2ORCID,Fernanda M. Silva 3ORCID,Luis Cid 2,4ORCID andPedro Duarte-Mendes 5,6,*ORCID 1 ESECS—Polytechnic of Leiria, 2411-901 Leiria, Portugal 2 Research Center in Sport, Health, and Human Development (CIDESD), 5001-801 Vila Real, Portugal 3 Research Unit for Sport and Physical Activity (CIDAF), Faculty of Sport Sciences and Physical Education, University of Coimbra, 3040-248 Coimbra, Portugal 4 Sport Sciences School of Rio Maior, Polytechnic of Santarém (ESDRM-IPSantarém), 2001-904 Santarém, Portugal 5 Department of Sports and Well-Being, Polytechnic Institute of Castelo Branco, 6000-266 Castelo Branco, Portugal 6 Sport Physical Activity and Health Research & Innovation Center, SPRINT, 2040-413 Santarém, Portugal * Author to whom correspondence should be addressed. Healthcare 2024, 12(17), 1733; https://doi.org/10.3390/healthcare12171733 Submission received: 5 August 2024 / Revised: 23 August 2024 / Accepted: 28 August 2024 / Published: 30 August 2024 (This article belongs to the Special Issue The Role of Physical Exercise in the Prevention and Treatment of Diseases) Downloadkeyboard_arrow_down Browse Figures Review Reports Versions Notes Abstract Functional Ankle Instability (FAI) is the subject of extensive research in sports and other environments. Given the importance of accurately measuring this latent construct, it is imperative to carry out a careful assessment of the available tools. In this context, the aim of this review was to take an in-depth look at the six most cited measurement tools to assess FAI, with a specific focus on patient-reported outcome measures related to ankle and foot. Four electronic databases (Web of Science, Scopus, Pubmed, and SportDiscus) were searched (up to November 2022) to identify the six most cited questionnaires for assessing FAI. Our analysis showed that the most cited questionnaires are the following: the Lower Extremity Functional Scale (LEFS), the Foot Function Index (FFI), the Foot and Ankle Ability Measure (FAAM), the Foot and Ankle Outcome Score (FAOS), the Olerud and Molander Ankle Score (OMAS), and the Cumberland Ankle Instability Tool (CAIT). Each questionnaire was thoroughly assessed and discussed in three sections: Development, Reliability, and Summaries. In addition, bibliometric data were calculated to analyze the relevance of each questionnaire. Despite variations in terms of validity and reliability, conceptualization, structure, and usefulness, the six questionnaires proved to be robust from a psychometric point of view, being widely supported in the literature. The bibliometric analyses suggested that the FAOS ranks first and the FFI ranks sixth in the weighted average of the impact factors of their original publications.
- The effect of smoking on lung function changes during a 16-week combined exercise program in middle-aged workers: a latent growth curve analysisPublication . Silva, Fernanda M.; Leitão Ferreira, José Pedro; Teixeira, Ana M.; Monteiro, Diogo; Duarte-Mendes, PedroPurpose To investigate the longitudinal changes in lung function of sedentary middle-aged workers over a 16-week combined exercise training program. Methods Thirty-six sedentary workers (53.70 ± 6.92 years old) were randomly allocated to either a combined aerobic and resistance training program (n = 18) or a control group (n = 18). Lung function was evaluated through spirometry using a portable flow spirometer (Spiropalm 6MWT, Cosmed, Italy). Predicted percentages of forced vital capacity (FVC), forced expiratory volume in the first second (FEV1), FEV1/FVC ratio, and mean forced expiratory flow between 25 and 75% of exhaled FVC (FEF25–75) were analyzed. Assessments were performed at baseline (M1), after 8-week (M2) and 16-week follow-up (M3). The changes in lung function were analyzed using the Latent Growth Curve Modeling that estimated interindividual and intraindividual growth paths. Results Smoking status revealed a significant effect on lung function growth with significant paths to intercept and slope for all models in both groups. The exercise group participants who are non-smokers revealed higher increases in FVC% (β = .22), FEV1% (β = .08), FEV1/FVC% ratio (β = .19), and FEF25–75% (β = .06) compared to those who are smokers from M1 to M3. The control group revealed a lower growth in lung function from M1 to M3, with a lower slope observed in smokers compared to non-smokers for FVC% (β = − .44), FEV1% (β = −.41), FEV1/FVC% (β = − .98), and FEF25–75% (β = − .52). Conclusion Our findings suggest that a 16-week combined training program is an effective strategy to improve lung function among sedentary workers, with a higher magnitude of improvement for non-smokers compared to smokers.
- Effects of a land and aquatic exercise-based program on pain, mobility and quality of life in patients with chronic low back pain: a study protocol for a randomized controlled trialPublication . Borges, Joana; Monteiro, Diogo; Silva, Fernanda M.; Susano Jacinto, Miguel Ângelo; Pastilha, Tiago; Duarte-Mendes, PedroBackground Chronic low back pain (CLBP) is a disease with significant functional, emotional and social impact. Several interventions are proposed for its management and exercise is one of main, land-based or water-based. This study describes a randomized controlled trial that will analyze the effect of a combined aquatic and land-based exercise program compared to an aquatic-based program on pain, functional incapacity and quality of life in adults with CLBP. Additionally, it will analyze the effects of exercise cessation in the same outcomes. Methods and design A blind randomized controlled trial will be developed with a 1:1 allocation ratio. Around 30 adults with mechanical CLBP will be randomly allocated in two groups. The experimental group (ALG) will complete an aquatic and land-based exercise program and control group (AG) will carry out only an aquatic program, both for 8 weeks. Participants will be assessed with Visual Analogue Scale, Oswestry Disability Index, Short-Form 36, Tampa Scale of Kinesiophobia-13 and Modified-Modified Schober Test, collected at baseline (M0), after 8 weeks (M1) and 4 weeks after the end of the intervention (M2). Discussion This study may provide a relevant contribution to understand the potential effect of a combined land and aquatic exercise program on pain, functional disability, fear of movement, quality of life and lumbar mobility. The results may provide important information for CLBP management. Trial registration This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov (registration number: NCT06641570; date of registration: October 14, 2024).