Repository logo

Browsing by Issue Date, starting with "2024-08-30"

Filter results by year or month
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
  • Assessing Functional Ankle Instability in Sport: A Critical Review and Bibliometric Analysis
    Publication . Alexandre, Élio; Monteiro, Diogo; SottoMayor, Ricardo; Jacinto, Miguel; Silva, Fernanda M.; Cid, Luis; Duarte-Mendes, Pedro
    first_pageDownload PDFsettingsOrder Article Reprints Open AccessReview Assessing Functional Ankle Instability in Sport: A Critical Review and Bibliometric Analysis by Élio Alexandre 1,Diogo Monteiro 1,2ORCID,Ricardo SottoMayor 1ORCID,Miguel Jacinto 1,2ORCID,Fernanda M. Silva 3ORCID,Luis Cid 2,4ORCID andPedro Duarte-Mendes 5,6,*ORCID 1 ESECS—Polytechnic of Leiria, 2411-901 Leiria, Portugal 2 Research Center in Sport, Health, and Human Development (CIDESD), 5001-801 Vila Real, Portugal 3 Research Unit for Sport and Physical Activity (CIDAF), Faculty of Sport Sciences and Physical Education, University of Coimbra, 3040-248 Coimbra, Portugal 4 Sport Sciences School of Rio Maior, Polytechnic of Santarém (ESDRM-IPSantarém), 2001-904 Santarém, Portugal 5 Department of Sports and Well-Being, Polytechnic Institute of Castelo Branco, 6000-266 Castelo Branco, Portugal 6 Sport Physical Activity and Health Research & Innovation Center, SPRINT, 2040-413 Santarém, Portugal * Author to whom correspondence should be addressed. Healthcare 2024, 12(17), 1733; https://doi.org/10.3390/healthcare12171733 Submission received: 5 August 2024 / Revised: 23 August 2024 / Accepted: 28 August 2024 / Published: 30 August 2024 (This article belongs to the Special Issue The Role of Physical Exercise in the Prevention and Treatment of Diseases) Downloadkeyboard_arrow_down Browse Figures Review Reports Versions Notes Abstract Functional Ankle Instability (FAI) is the subject of extensive research in sports and other environments. Given the importance of accurately measuring this latent construct, it is imperative to carry out a careful assessment of the available tools. In this context, the aim of this review was to take an in-depth look at the six most cited measurement tools to assess FAI, with a specific focus on patient-reported outcome measures related to ankle and foot. Four electronic databases (Web of Science, Scopus, Pubmed, and SportDiscus) were searched (up to November 2022) to identify the six most cited questionnaires for assessing FAI. Our analysis showed that the most cited questionnaires are the following: the Lower Extremity Functional Scale (LEFS), the Foot Function Index (FFI), the Foot and Ankle Ability Measure (FAAM), the Foot and Ankle Outcome Score (FAOS), the Olerud and Molander Ankle Score (OMAS), and the Cumberland Ankle Instability Tool (CAIT). Each questionnaire was thoroughly assessed and discussed in three sections: Development, Reliability, and Summaries. In addition, bibliometric data were calculated to analyze the relevance of each questionnaire. Despite variations in terms of validity and reliability, conceptualization, structure, and usefulness, the six questionnaires proved to be robust from a psychometric point of view, being widely supported in the literature. The bibliometric analyses suggested that the FAOS ranks first and the FFI ranks sixth in the weighted average of the impact factors of their original publications.
    2024-08-30Journal article Open access Show more