Browsing by Author "Nascimbene, Roberto"
Now showing 1 - 5 of 5
Results Per Page
Sort Options
- Analysis Issues on Seismic Assessment of Existing StructuresPublication . Sousa, Romain; Biachi, Federica; Nascimbene, Roberto; Pinho, RuiMany existing RC structures worldwide were designed for gravity loads only, with inadequate lateral load resistance, lateral stiffness and poor detailing of the reinforcement. Moreover, the concept of regularity both in plan and elevation that characterise a good conceptual design was, in most cases, not taken into account. The introduction in Europe of the regulations for seismic assessment of existing structures imposed stricter performance requirements for building structures. In order to take into account the poor seismic behaviour of such buildings, recent seismic codes – namely EC8 and NTC08, introduce a number of prescriptions regarding issues such as analysis type, load distribution, accidental eccentricity, etc. At the same time, these codes give room for engineering judgment to be used with reference to the definition of structural and non-structural elements such as slabs or infill walls, and obviously leave it up to the analyst decisions regarding Finite Elements typology, meshing, mass modelling, etc. The main goal of this work is thus to provide an extensive and wide evaluation on the influence of each of the abovementioned parameter on the seismic assessment of structures. For this purpose, nonlinear static analysis, as well as nonlinear dynamic analysis are performed on a real building that has also been experimentally tested in the past. The results will hopefully provide indications on the relative importance of each modelling parameter or decision.
- Effect of Different Modelling Assumptions on the Seismic Response of RC StructuresPublication . Sousa, Romain; Eroglu, T; Kazantzidou, D.; Kohrangi, M.; Sousa, Luís; Nascimbene, Roberto; Pinho, RuiThe introduction of new regulations for seismic assessment of structures established stricter performance requirements for existing buildings. In order to account for the poor seismic behaviour of such buildings, recent seismic codes, namely Eurocode 8 (EC8), introduce a number of prescriptions regarding issues such as analysis type, load distribution, accidental eccentricity, etc. At the same time, these codes give room for engineering judgment to be used with reference to the definition of structural and non-structural elements such as slabs or infill walls, and obviously leave the modelling assumptions, such as Finite Elements typology, meshing, mass modelling, etc. to the analyst decision. As such, four existing RC buildings, representative of traditional Mediterranean construction, considering different modelling assumptions, were subjected to an extensive number of nonlinear static analyses. The interpretation of possible deviations in the results will hopefully provide indications on the relative importance of each modelling parameter or decision.
- Modelling Issues on Seismic Assessment of Irregular RC StructuresPublication . Sousa, Romain; Bianchi, Federica; Pinho, Rui; Nascimbene, Roberto; Kazantzidou, DanaiMany existing RC structures worldwide were designed for gravity loads only, with inadequate lateral load resistance, lateral stiffness and poor detailing of the reinforcement. Moreover, the concept of regularity both in plan and elevation that characterise a good conceptual design was, in most cases, not taken into account. The introduction in Europe of the regulations for seismic assessment of existing structures imposed stricter performance requirements for building structures. In order to take into account the poor seismic behaviour of such buildings, recent seismic codes – namely EC8 and NTC08 (Italian code), introduce a number of prescriptions regarding issues such as analysis type, load distribution, accidental eccentricity, etc. At the same time, these codes give room for engineering judgment to be used with reference to the definition of structural and nonstructural elements such as slabs or infill walls, and obviously leave it up to the analyst decisions regarding Finite Elements typology, meshing, mass modelling, etc. The main goal of this work is thus to provide an extensive and wide evaluation on the influence of each of the abovementioned parameter on the seismic assessment of structures. For this purpose, nonlinear static procedures, as well as nonlinear dynamic analysis are performed on a real building that has also been experimentally tested in the past. The results will hopefully provide indications on the relative importance of each modelling parameter or decision.
- Problematiche di Modellazione nella Valutazione Sismica delle Strutture EsistentiPublication . Sousa, Romain; Bianchi, F.; Nascimbene, Roberto; Pinho, RuiProblemi di modellazione per l’analisi sismica delle strutture esistenti Molti edifici in c.a. del patrimonio edilizio esistente sono stati progettati per i soli carichi verticali, presentando un’inadeguata resistenza ai carichi laterali e scarsi dettagli costruttivi. Inoltre, il concetto di regolarità in pianta e in elevazione, tipico di una buona progettazione sismica, spesso è stato trascurato. Per valutare il comportamento sismico di tali edifici, alcune recenti normative in materia sismica - quali l’EC8 e le NTC08 - hanno introdotto diverse prescrizioni sulle tipologie di analisi, le distribuzioni di carico, l’eccentricità accidentale, ecc., lasciando, però, ai progettisti piena autonomia a proposito delle strategie di modellazione (es. impalcati, tamponamenti verticali, tipologia di elementi finiti, masse, ecc.). L’obiettivo del presente lavoro è quello di stimare, tramite l’esecuzione di analisi non-lineari (statiche e dinamiche) per un edificio reale, l’influenza di tali strategie nella valutazione sismica delle strutture, al fine di fornire indicazioni sull’importanza di ogni scelta progettuale.
- Using Nonlinear Static Procedures for the Seismic Assessment of Irregular RC BuildingsPublication . Sousa, Romain; Eroglu, T; Kazantzidou, D.; Kohrangi, M.; Sousa, L.; Nascimbene, Roberto; Pinho, R.The application of Nonlinear Static Procedures (NSPs) to assess the seismic vulnerability of existing structures has become widely accepted and extensively used in the literature as well as in engineering practice. Nevertheless, their success in predicting the response of irregular buildings is not yet fully verified. The main goal of the present study is to evaluate the capability and accuracy of some of the existing nonlinear static procedures (N2 and ACSM, in this case) to estimate the seismic performance of irregular structures. In order to accomplish this objective, four existing buildings, irregular in plan and elevation, were subjected to an extensive number of nonlinear static and dynamic analyses. The comparisons, focused on both global and local response parameters provide first indications on the reliability of static procedures to estimate the actual response of irregular RC buildings.