Repository logo
 
Publication

Use of post-earthquake damage data to calibrate, validate and compare two seismic vulnerability assessment methods for vernacular architecture

dc.contributor.authorOrtega, Javier
dc.contributor.authorVasconcelos, Graça
dc.contributor.authorRodrigues, Hugo
dc.contributor.authorCorreia, Mariana
dc.contributor.authorFerreira, Tiago Miguel
dc.contributor.authorVicente, Romeu
dc.date.accessioned2019-09-27T10:35:31Z
dc.date.available2019-09-27T10:35:31Z
dc.date.issued2019
dc.description.abstractThe paper presents and discusses the application of two large scale seismic vulnerability assessment methods on the island of Faial in Azores (Portugal). The two methods are specifically conceived to assess the seismic vulnerability of vernacular architecture. The first method follows a classical seismic vulnerability index approach and is referred as SVIVA (Seismic Vulnerability Index for Vernacular Architecture). The second method is referred as SAVVAS (Seismic Assessment of the Vulnerability of Vernacular Architecture Structures) and it is a numerical tool intended to estimate the seismic capacity of vernacular buildings in terms of seismic load factors associated with different structural damage limit states. The main reason behind the selection of Faial Island as a case study was the availability of post-earthquake reports of the building stock after the 1998 Azores earthquake, which allowed comparing the damage scenarios obtained using both methods with the post-earthquake damage data and thus helped for the calibration and validation of the two methods. The application of both methods led to a good fit between estimated versus observed damage grades, which validated their applicability as large-scale first level approaches. Moreover, as the main outcome, the paper presents the novelties of the SAVVAS method, which had not been applied before, and discusses its main advantages, namely: no need for calibration with previous post-earthquake damage data, an enhancement of the prediction capabilities, a more individualized evaluation of the buildings and the possibility to assess the seismic performance of the building in different loading directions.pt_PT
dc.description.versioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionpt_PT
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.ijdrr.2019.101242
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10400.8/4127
dc.language.isoengpt_PT
dc.peerreviewedyespt_PT
dc.publisherElsevier Ltdpt_PT
dc.subject1998 Azores earthquakept_PT
dc.subjectVulnerability indexpt_PT
dc.subjectStone masonrypt_PT
dc.subjectVernacular architecturept_PT
dc.subjectSeismic vulnerability assessmentpt_PT
dc.titleUse of post-earthquake damage data to calibrate, validate and compare two seismic vulnerability assessment methods for vernacular architecturept_PT
dc.typejournal article
dspace.entity.typePublication
oaire.citation.startPage101242pt_PT
oaire.citation.titleInternational Journal of Disaster Risk Reductionpt_PT
oaire.citation.volume39pt_PT
person.familyNamePinheiro Rodrigues
person.givenNameHugo Filipe
person.identifierE-5195-2010
person.identifier.ciencia-idB610-29E9-0E49
person.identifier.orcid0000-0003-1373-4540
person.identifier.scopus-author-id23019838500
rcaap.rightsrestrictedAccesspt_PT
rcaap.typearticlept_PT
relation.isAuthorOfPublicationa461f4ce-a879-4898-99ec-2fa09e1cfb46
relation.isAuthorOfPublication.latestForDiscoverya461f4ce-a879-4898-99ec-2fa09e1cfb46

Files

Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
No Thumbnail Available
Name:
1-s2.0-S2212420919301839-main.pdf
Size:
4.61 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:
License bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
No Thumbnail Available
Name:
license.txt
Size:
1.32 KB
Format:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Description: